Bluetooth Vs Radio Trackers - Which One Is Best For Your Situation?

There are different types of key finders and other tracking systems. Bluetooth technology is one option, and then there is RFID radio technology. When you look at Bluetooth vs radio trackers, you have to understand that Bluetooth is a type of radio technology, too. That doesn't mean that there aren't differences when it comes to these two tracking technologies. There are indeed, and it pays to know what they are if you are going to invest in one of the key finder systems.

There are also different types of RFID systems great for locating missing items. Two of the types are represented by active RFID and passive RFID. That is helpful to know, and then there is alo iBeacon, too. Things really get a little confusing and intertwined when you look at iBeacon. Why? It's because the iBeacon is part of the active RFID group, but it utilizes Bluetooth technology. Talk about blurred lines, right?

You don't have to worry about batteries when it comes to a passive RFID system. That is just one of the benefits and advantages over other devices. Each type of device has its benefits of course. When it comes to active RFID or BLE systems, you have technology that usually is independent or doesn't require the IT integration that other technologies require. You can expect this technology to cost less, too.

Which technology you use really depends on what you have going on as well. These technologies are used for much more than just finding keys. They are used for a variety of different purposes when it comes to tracking assets. A great example is the fact that shipping companies use them, and you might consider the fact that in those instances, wouldn't passive RFID be the best bet?

It certainly seems like passive RFID would be the choice for shipping companies. But maybe you have nothing to do with a shipping company and are thinking about which technology to use for a different purpose. One thing you need to know is that when it comes to BLE or Bluetooth technology, interference can come into play. If you weren't aware of that, it's something to think about.

Many people still count on BLE technology to work for them. When it comes to tracking assets in volume, it appears that the passive technology is better. That's mostly in part to low cost tags, but there are other reasons of course. But of course, BLE or active RFID also has its advantages. One is in relation to asset tracking compliance issues, as the technology can help streamline activities.

BLE is great for quality control as well. Then there are those visitors badges and property monitoring. There are all kinds of different situations where people use these technologies, and you might have a better idea about which one would work best for your situation now. You might want to compare the differences a little bit further, but that's a decent in-depth analysis. You will just want to be sure that you make the right move.

Comments